no .bbl file generatedAdd tags
12 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
no .bbl file generatedI have a multichapter document, using \include for each chapter, and have just started to add in references, and no .bbl file is generated despite running LaTeX repeatedly. Here is an edited down version of the master file -- any ideas on what may be preventing the bbl file being generated?
In case it makes a difference, I'm using TeXshop 2.14 on Mac OS X.
Re: no .bbl file generatedHi,
did you use \cite inside your document? Try \nocite{*} to get all references of the bib file listed. Stefan LaTeX Community Administrator
Re: no .bbl file generated
Remember that it's not LaTeX that generates the BBL, it's BibTeX.
I don't recall if TeXShop attempts to do this automatically. If it doesn't, you need to make sure you run BibTeX whenever you need to update your BBL.
Re: no .bbl file generatedHi,
perhaps have a look at this tutorial: Getting to Grips with Latex - Bibliography Management, section Why won't Latex generate any output?. Stefan LaTeX Community Administrator
Re: no .bbl file generatedThanks for all the tutorial stuff. I don't know how often I've done exactly this in past but somehow the fact that TexShop doesn't understand when to invoke Bibtex had escaped me.
Re: no .bbl file generated
You might consider using the Perl script latexmk. I've never used it myself, but I know lots of people who seem to like it. It runs in the background and runs LaTeX, BibTeX, makeindex, etc. whenever necessary. While TeXShop and the OS X 10.5 version of Preview auto-refresh, lots of other PDF viewers do not. Additionally, neither program are exceptional PDF viewers. You might want to give Skim a shot (ESPECIALLY if you stop using TeXShop (personally, I use Vim with the Vim-LaTeX suite to do my editing)). It's a terrific viewer, and it has lots of features that will make LaTeXers happy (support for inverse searching is one example).
Re: no .bbl file generatedHi,
I had a similar problem. I use WinEdt/LEd + Miktex. My .bbl file did not contain any references so was practically empty and the \cite{} comments I added resulted in questionmarks like this: "[?]". For me, the problem was solved when I specified the whole path to the .bib file and did not add ".bib" behind the filename. Example: \bibliography{D:/.../filename} It's a little late to post this but I hope someone will benefit from it. Laura
Re: no .bbl file generatedHi Laura,
welcome to the board and thank you for contributing your solution! Stefan LaTeX Community Administrator
Re: no .bbl file generated
It's never to late to post a useful solution for a problem. Thanks for this initial contribution. Best regards and welcome to the board Thorsten¹ LaTeX Community Moderator
How to make a "Minimal Example" Board Rules Avoidable Mistakes ¹ System: openSUSE 12.3, TeX Live 2012, TeXworks 0.5 (r1288) ² Learning TeX (and trying to understand it).
Re: no .bbl file generatedHi,
I am using Miktex + Texmaker and even i faced the same problem while using the bibtex. After running latex on the .tex file, .aux file was generated. But running Bibtex on the .tex file now did not generate the .bbl file. The workaround: 1) Run Latex on the btest.tex file Latex btest.tex The following files are generated btest.aux btest.dvi btest.log 2) Rename the btest.aux file to btest.tex.aux 3) Run Bibtex on the .tex file bibtex btest.tex The following files are generated: btest.tex.bbl btest.tex.blg 4) Rename the btest.tex.bbl file to btest.bbl.tex (probably you can skip this step) 5) Run Latex on the btest.tex file twice The problem is fixed. I am not sure if it works in your environment.
12 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests |





